gre写作模板:GRE作文范文大全(123)_GRE作文-查字典留学网
 
请输入您要查询的关键词
您现在的位置: 留学网首页 >> GRE >> GRE作文 >> gre写作模板:GRE作文范文大全(123)

gre写作模板:GRE作文范文大全(123)

发布时间:2012-02-02来源:查字典留学网

gre写作模板:GRE作文范文大全(123)

Gre写作是美国所有作文考试中时刻最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试,而在短期内提高gre写作能力不是一天两天可以完成额,所以我们在备考2011新gre写作时必然要对问题问题深切的剖析,体味以下优异范文的文章结构,以提高新gre写作的整体分数。

In this memo Grove College's administration recommends preserving its tradition of

admitting only female students. The administration admits that most faculty members are in

favor of a co-educational policy as a means of encouraging more students to apply to Grove.

But the administration defends its recommendation by citing a student government survey in

which 80% of student respondents and more than 50% of alumni respondents reported that

they favor the status quo. The administration reasons that preserving the status quo would

209

improve student morale and help ensure continued alumni donations to Grove. This argument

is flawed in several critical respects.

First, the memo provides no evidence that the results of either of the two surveys are

statistically reliable. For example, suppose newer students tend to be content with the all

female policy while students who have attended Grove for a longer time would prefer a

co-educational policy. If a disproportionate number of the survey's respondents were newer

students, then the survey results would distort the student body's opinion as a group. With

respect to the alumni survey, perhaps fewer alumni who donate substantial sums to Grove

responded to the survey than other alumni did. If so, then the survey results would distort the

comparison between the total amount of future donations under the two scenarios. Besides,

the memo provides no information about what percentage of Grove's students and alumni

responded to the surveys; the lower the percentages, the less reliable the results of the

surveys.

Secondly, the administration hastily assumes that Grove's alumni as a group would be less

inclined to donate money merely if Grove begins admitting male students. This aspect of

Grove's admission policy is only one of many factors that might affect alumni donations. For

example, since Grove's faculty are generally in favor of changing the policy, perhaps the

change would improve faculty morale and therefore the quality of instruction, in mm having a

positive impact on alumni donations. And, if the particular alumni who are in a position to make

the largest contributions recognize faculty morale as important, an increase in donations by

these individuals might very well offset a dedine in smaller donations by other alumni.

Finally, the administration's argument that student morale would improve under the status

quo is logically unsound in two respects. First, the administration provides no reason why

morale would improve, as opposed to remaining at its current level, if the status quo is simply

maintained. Second, the administration cannot logically determine how the morale of the

student body would be affected under a co-educational policy until it implements that policy

and takes into account the morale of the new male students along with that of all female

students. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(123) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。Gre写作是美国所有作文考试中时刻最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试,而在短期内提高gre写作能力不是一天两天可以完成额,所以我们在备考2011新gre写作时必然要对问题问题深切的剖析,体味以下优异范文的文章结构,以提高新gre写作的整体分数。

In sum, the administration has failed to convince me that maintaining Grove's all-female

policy would be more likely to improve student morale and help ensure continued alumni

donations than moving to a co-educational policy. To better assess the argument I would need

detailed information about the two surveys to determine whether the respondents as groups

were representative of their respective populations. To bolster its recommendation the

administration must provide better evidence--perhaps by way of a reliable alumni survey that

takes into account respondents' financial status and history of donadons--that prospective

donor alumni would be strongly opposed to a co-educational policy and would be less inclined

to donate money were Grove to implement such a policy.

Argument 63

The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville.

"All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High

School. In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have involved

teenage drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that they are too

210

busy to teach their teenagers to drive, some other instruction is necessary to ensure that these

teenagers are safe drivers. Although there are two driving schools in Centerville, parents on a

tight budget cannot afford to pay for driving instruction. Therefore an effective and mandatory

program sponsored by the high school is the only solution to this serious problem."

This letter recommends mandatory driver's education courses at Centerville High School.

The author bases this recommendation on three facts: during the last two years several

Centerville car accidents have involved teenage drivers; Centerville parents are too busy to

teach driving to their children; and the two private driver-education courses in the area are

expensive. As discussed below, the argument suffers from several critical flaws and is

therefore unpersuasive. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(123) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。Gre写作是美国所有作文考试中时刻最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试,而在短期内提高gre写作能力不是一天两天可以完成额,所以我们在备考2011新gre写作时必然要对问题问题深切的剖析,体味以下优异范文的文章结构,以提高新gre写作的整体分数。

First of all, the letter fails to indicate who or what caused the car accidents to which the letter

refers. If Centerville High School students caused the accidents, and if those accidents would

have been avoided had these students enrolled in the high school's driving course, then the

argument would have merit. However, it is equally likely that the other drivers were at fault, or

that no driver was at fault. Moreover, it is entirely possible that the teenage drivers had in fact

taken the high school's driving course, or that they were not local high school students in the

first place. The author must rule out all these possibilities in order to conclude confidently that

a school-sponsored mandatory driving course would have prevented these accidents.

Secondly, whether the fact that several car accidents the last two years involved teenage

drivers suggests a need for a mandatory driving course depends partly on the comparative

accident rate during earlier years. It is entirely possible, for instance, that the rate of accidents

involving teenagers has been steadily declining, and that this decline is due to the availability

of the two private driving courses. Without ruling out this possibility, the letter's conclusion is

not defensible.

The argument is problematic in certain other respects as well. It assumes that a mandatory

school-sponsored course would be effective, yet provides no evidence to support this

assumption. Similarly, the argument fails to substantiate its assumption that a significant

percentage of Centerville's parents cannot afford private driving instruction for their teenage

children. Absent substantiating evidence for either of these necessary assumptions, I cannot

be convinced that Centerville should establish the proposed driving course.

In conclusion, the letter's author fails to adequately support the recommendation for a

school-sponsored mandatory driving course. To strengthen the argument, the author must

provide clear evidence that Centerville High School students caused the accidents in question,

and that a mandatory driving course would have prevented them. To better evaluate the

argument, I would need more information about the affordability of the two private driving

courses and about the effectiveness of a mandatory school-sponsored course compared to

that of the two private courses. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(123) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。

最新文章