gre作文大讲堂:GRE作文范文大全(106)_GRE作文-查字典留学网
 
请输入您要查询的关键词
您现在的位置: 留学网首页 >> GRE >> GRE作文 >> gre作文大讲堂:GRE作文范文大全(106)

gre作文大讲堂:GRE作文范文大全(106)

发布时间:2012-01-18来源:查字典留学网

gre作文大讲堂:GRE作文范文大全(106)

GRE,全称Graduate Record Examination,中文名称为美国研究生入学考试,适用于除法律与商业外的各专业。由美国教育考试服务处(Educational Testing Service,简称ETS)主办,GRE是美国、加拿大的大学各类研究生院(除管理类学院,法学院)要求申请者所必须具备的一个考试成绩,也是教授对申请者是否授予奖学金所依据的最重要的标准。 另有,Generic Routing Encapsulation(通用路由封装)也简称GRE。

As for the second finding, the term "many" is far too vague to allow for any meaningful

conclusions; if "many" amounts to an insignificant percentage of downsized employees, then

the finding is of little use in refuting the article's claim. Moreover, the workers to whom this

finding refers are not necessarily downsized corporate employees. To the extent that they are

not, this second finding is irrelevant in drawing any conclusions about the impact of corporate

downsizing on downsized employees.

The third finding would lend support to the author's position only under two assumptions: (1)

that the newly created jobs in those high-paying industries are suitable for downsized

corporate employees, and (2) that the new jobs are among the high-paying ones. Otherwise,

downsized employees seeking jobs would be unlikely to regain their former economic status

by applying for these newly created positions, whether or not these positions are full-time.

In sum, the author has not effectively refuted the article's claim that corporate downsizing

has worked economic hardship on downsized corporate employees. To more effectively refute

the claim the author should provide clear evidence that most of those job-seekers are able to

fill the sorts of new jobs that have been created since 1992, and that these new positions are

suitable for those job-seekers given their work experience, areas of interest, and former

salaries.

175

Argument 32

According to a poll of 200 charitable organizations, donations of money to nonprofit groups

increased by nearly 25 percent last year, though not all charities gained equally. Religious

groups gained the most (30 percent), followed by environmental groups (23 percent), whereas

educational institutions experienced only a very small increase in donations (3 percent). This

poll indicates that more people are willing and able to give money to charities but that funding

for education is not a priority for most people. These differences in donation rates must result

from the perception that educational institutions are less in need of donations than are other

kinds of institutions. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(106) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。GRE,全称Graduate Record Examination,中文名称为美国研究生入学考试,适用于除法律与商业外的各专业。由美国教育考试服务处(Educational Testing Service,简称ETS)主办,GRE是美国、加拿大的大学各类研究生院(除管理类学院,法学院)要求申请者所必须具备的一个考试成绩,也是教授对申请者是否授予奖学金所依据的最重要的标准。 另有,Generic Routing Encapsulation(通用路由封装)也简称GRE。

In this argument the author cites a poll showing that the amount of charitable donations

increased last year, but that the increase to educational institutions was far less than to either

religious or environmental groups. Based on this evidence the author condudes that more

people are willing and able to make charitable donations, but that education is not a priority for

most people. The author also concludes that the discrepancy among donation rates is the

result of a general perception that educational institutions are in less need of money than other

insttutons are. This argument depends on several unsubstanuated assumptions and is

therefore unpersuasive as it stands.

First of all, the author's conclusions about people's willingness to donate to the three types

of charities listed depend on the assumption that the poll results are statistically reliable. Yet,

the author offers no evidence to substantiate this assumption. The author must show that the

200 charitable organizations polled constitute a sufficiently large sample of religious,

environmental, and educational charities, and that this sample is representative of all such

charities. Otherwise, the author cannot confidently draw any general conclusions about the

willingness of people to donate to these three types of institutions, or about general

perceptions regarding the needs of any such institutions.

Similarly, the author's sweeping claim that "more people are willing and able to give money

to charities" depends on the assumption that the poll results are sufficiently representative of

charitable giving in general. Yet, the author offers no evidence to substantiate this assumption.

The author must show that the 25% total increase in the rate of donations to the three types of

institutions polled is representative of the increase in donations to all types of charities. The

author must also show that the total number of donors actually increased last year; as it stands

the argument leaves open the possibility that the total number of donors decreased last year

while the average amount given by each donor increased. Absent evidence to support these

assumptions, the author's broad contusion that "more people are willing and able" to make

charitable donations is dubious at best. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(106) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。GRE,全称Graduate Record Examination,中文名称为美国研究生入学考试,适用于除法律与商业外的各专业。由美国教育考试服务处(Educational Testing Service,简称ETS)主办,GRE是美国、加拿大的大学各类研究生院(除管理类学院,法学院)要求申请者所必须具备的一个考试成绩,也是教授对申请者是否授予奖学金所依据的最重要的标准。 另有,Generic Routing Encapsulation(通用路由封装)也简称GRE。

Additionally, the author provides no evidence whatsoever for the claim that educational

institutions are perceived as less needy than other institutions, or that this perception explains

the lower donation rate to educational institutions. Lacking such evidence, there are many

other possible explanations for the discrepancy in donation rates. Perhaps people's perception

is that educational institutions are more likely than the other types to squander or misuse

donated money; or perhaps most donors are simply more interested in advocating religions or

176

environmental protection than in subsidizing education. For that matter, perhaps among all

charitable organizations educational institutions ranked third last year in terms of gifts received

bettered only by religious and environmental charities. Such evidence would serve to

undermine the author's claim that funding for education is "not a priority for most people."

In conclusion, the argument is indefensible as it stands. To strengthen it the author must

assure me that the poll results accurately reflect donation rates not only to all religious,

environmental, and educational institutions but also to the broader group of all charitable

institutions. The author must also provide clear evidence for the claimed perception about the

need of educational institutions and that this perception, and not some other factor, explains

the comparatively low donation rate to these institutions. 感谢您阅读《GRE作文范文大全(106) 》一文,查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。

最新文章