gre写作宝典：GRE argument范文5篇（四）
GRE考试形式：中国大陆地区、香港、澳门、韩国目前执行分开考试的形式。由机考（分析性写作）和笔试（语文、数学）组成。
The following is from an editorial in the Midvale Observer， a local newspaper.
"Ever since the 1950‘s， when television sets began to appear in the average home， the rate of crimes committed by teenagers in the country of Alta has steadily increased. This increase in teenage crime parallels the increase in violence shown on television. According to several national studies， even very young children who watch a great number of television shows featuring violent scenes display more violent behavior within their home environment than do children who do not watch violent shows. Furthermore， in a survey conducted by the Observer， over 90 percent of the respondents were parents who indicated that prime-time television--programs that are shown between 7 p.m. and 9 p.m.---should show less violence. Therefore， in order to lower the rate of teenage crime in Alta， television viewers should demand that television programmers reduce the amount of violence shown during prime time."
The author of this editorial states that the rate of teenage crime in the country of Alta has increased along with the increase in violence shown on television， beginning with the 1950‘s when television was introduced in the average home. In addition， the author states that several national surveys have shown that young children watching violent television programs are more prone to violence than children who do not. The write also says that a survey indicated that ninety percent of parents responding said that prime-time programs should show less violence. Finally， the author comes to the conclusion that to lower the rate of teenage crime in Alta， television watchers should demand a reduction in violence shown during prime time. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.
Firstly， the writer equates the rate of increase in teenage crime in Alta to the increase in violence shown on television but gives no causal linkage other than the similar time periods. The author makes no distinction between types of crimes - whether they are violent or nonviolent crimes by teenagers. Furthermore， there are several possible alternative causes for the increase in teen crimes. For example， perhaps all types of crimes have increased for all ages， or maybe the police are now doing a better job of catching teenage criminals than they were before. Perhaps the reason for the increase is simply an increase in the overall population and that as a percentage of the population， teen crime is even less than it was before. Without ruling out these and other causes， the argument fails to convince by showing no causal linkage between television violence and teenage crime.
Secondly， the author mentions national studies that show that young children that watch violent programs show more violent behavior at home than children who do not watch such programs. This argument fails on two levels - one by assuming that children and teenagers are equally affected by television programs; and two by again assuming that there is some type of cause and effect relationship between television violence and teenage crime. Young children and teenagers are not the same and it should not be assumed that more violent behavior within the home leads to crimes outside as these children grow into teenagers.
Thirdly， the author offers a survey showing that ninety percent of the respondents were parents who indicated that prime time television programs should show less violence. The survey methods are not discussed - it is possible that the sample was improperly chosen or somehow predisposed to include parents that are very much opposed to television violence. Additionally， it is possible that such parents are far more vocal in their opinions than those who care little or not at all about prime time television violence， again skewing the results of the survey. Even assuming the veracity of the sample population surveyed， it is not logical to associate television violence with teen crime solely on that basis.
Finally， the author makes the gratuitous assumption that simply having television viewers demand that television programmers reduce the amount of violence during prime time will lower the rate of teenage crime in Alta. Regardless of the flawed arguments previously discussed， simply demanding a change will have no effect whatsoever on teen crime. To strengthen his or her argument， the author needs to show some direct causal linkage between television violence and teen crime rather than making vague and unsupported comparisons purporting to show a link. There is no proof given either that television violence of any kind causes teenage crime or that a reduction in prime time violence will keep teenagers from breaking the law
感谢您阅读《GRE argument范文5篇（四） 》一文，查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。GRE考试形式：中国大陆地区、香港、澳门、韩国目前执行分开考试的形式。由机考（分析性写作）和笔试（语文、数学）组成。
参考译文
［题目］
下述文字一份地方性报纸《Midvale观察家》所发表的社论。
"自二十世纪五十年代以来，当电视机开始出现于平常百姓家庭时，Alta国内青少年犯罪率已呈现出持续上升的势头。这一青少年犯罪行为的上升与电视上所播放的暴力画面的增加成正比。按照几份全国性调查报告，在那些大量观看了涉及到暴力场面的电视节目的青少年中，即使是极为年幼的孩童在其家庭环境中也要比那些不看暴力节目的孩童表现出更多的暴力行为。此外，在一项由《Midvale观察家》所进行的调查中，有90%的受访者为父母亲，他们表示黄金时段的电视内容--即晚上7点到9点所播放的节目--应该减少播放暴力内容。据此，为了降低Alta国内青少年犯罪率，电视观众应该要求电视节目编播者减少黄金时段所播放的暴力画面数量。"
[范文正文]
本社论陈述道，Alta国内青少年犯罪率伴随着电视所播放的暴力场面的增加而上升。这一情形始于二十世纪五十年代，因为电视在当时被引入到普通百姓的家庭。此外，该陈述道，几项全国性调查显示，观看暴力电视节目的孩子比那些不看同类节目的孩子更易于形成暴力倾向。社论还指出，一份调查表明，受访的90%的父母亲认为，黄金时段的电视节目不应含有那么多的暴力场面。最后，得出结论，认为要想降低Alta国内的青少年犯罪率，电视观众应要求减少黄金时段所播放的暴力画面。这一论述犯有若干关键性的逻辑谬误。
感谢您阅读《GRE argument范文5篇（四） 》一文，查字典出国留学网()编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。
原文来源： 点击查看更多与《gre写作宝典：GRE argument范文5篇（四）》相关的文章>> 2012-05-11· GRE作文范文：历年GRE考试Issue主题范文及评析35 2012-05-11· gre作文模板：历年GRE考试Issue主题范文及评析20 2012-04-21· 2012gre写作例子：ÀúÄêGRE¿¼ÊÔIssueÌâ¿â·ÖÎöÓëÌá¸ÙÈýÊ®¾Å 2012-04-21· GRE写作备考：历年GRE考试Issue题库分析与提纲四十八 2012-04-21· gre范文：历年GRE考试Issue题库分析与提纲五十九 2012-04-21· GRE写作备考2012：历年GRE考试Issue题库分析与提纲六十六 2012-04-21· gre作文模板：2012新GRE考试写作常用句 2012-04-21· gre作文大讲堂：历年GRE考试Issue题库分析与提纲二十八 2012-04-21· GRE备考：ÀúÄêGRE¿¼ÊÔIssueÌâ¿â·ÖÎöÓëÌá¸ÙËÄÊ® 2012-04-21· gre写作模板：ÀúÄêGRE¿¼ÊÔIssueÌâ¿â·ÖÎöÓëÌá¸ÙËÄÊ®ËÄ